Skip to content
NOWCAST WXII 12 News on Triad CW at 10pm
Live Now
Advertisement

Supreme Court opinion has some in LGBTQ community worried

"I think many of us in the LGBTQ community expected there to be some kind of fight in our future,"

Supreme Court opinion has some in LGBTQ community worried

"I think many of us in the LGBTQ community expected there to be some kind of fight in our future,"

WHAT LED UP TO THE SHOOTING. ROE V. WADE WAS OF COURSE OVERTURNED FRIDAY MORNING SPARKING PROTESTS ACROSS THE COUNTRY AND SOME HERE IN THE PIEDMONT TRY IT CALLS TO REVISIT LANDMARK LGBTQ CASES. GENERATED NOW QUITE A BIT OF DISCUSSION, BUT HOW LIKELY IS THAT? REALLY FORT HATCHET HAS A REPORT. IN THE FALL OF THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION TO OVERTURN ROE VERSUS WADE A NOTABLE OPINION FROM JUSTICE CLARENCE. THOMAS HAS GOT THE ATTENTION OF MANY IN THE LGBTQ COMMUNITY THOMAS WROTE THAT HE THINKS THE COURT SHOULD REVISIT OBERGERFELL VERSUS HODGES AND LAWRENCE FIRST TEXAS LEAVING SOME IN THE COMMUNITY VERY WORRIED. THE 2003 LAWRENCE DECISION LEGALIZES SAME-SEX INTIMACY AND A PERSON’S HOME WHILE A BURGERFUEL LEGALIZED SAME. MARRIAGE IN 2015, SO I’LL JUST PRUDENCE AT THE SUPREME COURT RECOGNIZING LGBTQ RIGHTS HAS BEEN SINCE 1996 THAT RECENCY HAS LEFT SOME UNSURPRISED BY ATTEMPTS TO REVISIT THE LANDMARK CASES. I THINK MANY OF US IN THE LGBTQ COMMUNITY EXPECTED. THERE TO BE SOME KIND OF FIGHT IN OUR FUTURE I THINK THAT THE WAY THIS WAS POSITIONED AFTER OVERTURNING. ROE V. WADE SETS A DANGEROUS PRECEDENT, BUT WAKE LAW PROFESSOR MARIA EMILY GEORGE SAYS THOMAS’S OPINION BREAKS WITH OTHER CONSERVATIVES ON THE COURT AND IN FACT, THE MAJORITY OPINION IS REALLY REALLY CLEAR IN SAYING WE ARE JUST ADDRESSING ABORTION THOSE REASSURANCES DO LITTLE TO COMFORT THOSE WORRIED ABOUT THEIR OWN RIGHTS IF YOU’RE DOWNPLAYING WHETHER OR NOT THE COURTS AND LAWMAKERS IN GENERAL ARE GOING TO COME AFTER A MARRIAGE EQUALITY WE WE THOUGHT THEY WOULDN’T COME AFTER A ROW V WADE. WE THOUGHT THIS WAS IMPOSSIBLE NATIONWIDE SUPPORT FOR SAME-SEX. MARRIAGE IS UP TO A NEW RECORD HIGH OF 71% ACCORDING TO A GALLUP POLL RELEASED EARLIER THIS MONTH MAKING A SUPREME COURT REVERSAL A LONG SHOT ACCORDING TO GEORGE AND THEY MIGHT YOU KNOW DECIDE THAT THINGS TIP IN ONCE OR ANOTHER WHEN THE COUNTRY IS REALLY DIVIDED WHAT IS VERY RARE IS TO SEE A DECISION WHERE THE COURT IS DOING SOMETHING THAT IS SO OPPOSITE TO SUCH A CLEAR MAJORITY HERE IN GREENSBORO TONIGHT AT 6:30 ALTERNATIVE RESOURCES OF THE TRIAD IS HOSTING A PRIDE MARCH TO REMEMBER COMMEMORATING THE 53RD ANNIVERSARY OF THE STONEWALL RIOTS IN NEW YORK CIT
Advertisement
Supreme Court opinion has some in LGBTQ community worried

"I think many of us in the LGBTQ community expected there to be some kind of fight in our future,"

In the fallout of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in Friday's Dobbs v. Jackson ruling, a notable opinion from Justice Clarence Thomas has caught the attention of many in the LGBTQ community.Thomas wrote that the rulings in both Obergefell v. Hodges and Lawrence v. Texas should be revisited leaving some in the LGBTQ community feeling fearful. The 2003 Lawrence decision legalizes same-sex intimacy in a person’s home, while Obergefell legalized same-sex marriage in 2015."All of the constitutional jurisprudence at the supreme court recognizing LGBTQ rights has been since 1996," said Wake Forest University Law School Associate Professor, Marie-Amélie George."I think many of us in the LGBTQ community expected there to be some kind of fight in our future," said Guilford Green Foundation and LGBTQ Center’s Executive Director Jennifer Ruppe. "I think that the way this was positioned after overturning roe v wade sets a dangerous precedence for being able to overturn other rights."George said Thomas' opinion breaks with the other conservative justices on the court."The majority opinion is really really clear in saying we are just addressing abortion,” George said. "That does not mean they are going to reevaluate LGBTQ rights decisions, but it should provide concern because it does provide a really strong basis for doing that."Those reassurances do little to comfort those that are worried about their own rights."If you’re downplaying whether or not the courts, or whether lawmakers, in general, are going to go after marriage equality, we thought they wouldn’t go after Roe v. Wade. We thought it was impossible," Ruppe said. Nationwide support for same-sex marriage is up to a new record high of 71% according to a Gallup poll released earlier this month. "The court really lacks legitimacy when it rules in way that are against what the majority of Americans want,” George said. "They might decide and tip one side or the other when the country is really divided but what is very rare is to see a decision that is so opposite to such a clear majority of Americans.”

In the fallout of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in Friday's Dobbs v. Jackson ruling, a notable opinion from Justice Clarence Thomas has caught the attention of many in the LGBTQ community.

Thomas wrote that the rulings in both Obergefell v. Hodges and Lawrence v. Texas should be revisited leaving some in the LGBTQ community feeling fearful.

Advertisement

The 2003 Lawrence decision legalizes same-sex intimacy in a person’s home, while Obergefell legalized same-sex marriage in 2015.

"All of the constitutional jurisprudence at the supreme court recognizing LGBTQ rights has been since 1996," said Wake Forest University Law School Associate Professor, Marie-Amélie George.

"I think many of us in the LGBTQ community expected there to be some kind of fight in our future," said Guilford Green Foundation and LGBTQ Center’s Executive Director Jennifer Ruppe. "I think that the way this was positioned after overturning roe v wade sets a dangerous precedence for being able to overturn other rights."

George said Thomas' opinion breaks with the other conservative justices on the court.

"The majority opinion is really really clear in saying we are just addressing abortion,” George said. "That does not mean they are going to reevaluate LGBTQ rights decisions, but it should provide concern because it does provide a really strong basis for doing that."

Those reassurances do little to comfort those that are worried about their own rights.

"If you’re downplaying whether or not the courts, or whether lawmakers, in general, are going to go after marriage equality, we thought they wouldn’t go after Roe v. Wade. We thought it was impossible," Ruppe said.

Nationwide support for same-sex marriage is up to a new record high of 71% according to a Gallup poll released earlier this month.

"The court really lacks legitimacy when it rules in way that are against what the majority of Americans want,” George said. "They might decide and tip one side or the other when the country is really divided but what is very rare is to see a decision that is so opposite to such a clear majority of Americans.”